What Pregnant Women Need to Know About 5,797 Work-Related Complaints

Walmart pregnancy case

The Washington Post recently published a story about mammoth retailer Wal-mart’s new policy that allows pregnant women more options so that they can continue to work even late into their pregnancy. While this change of policy is a moral and economic victory for pregnant Wal-mart employees, it did not come without a fight.

In 2011, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission received 5,797 pregnancy-related complaints from women who represented all walks of life from a cashier to corporate executives who felt that they were discriminated against by their employers solely on the grounds of being pregnant. According to the National Women’s Law Center, almost 9 out of 10 women worked into their last two months of pregnancy which carries an increased risk of complications. Rather than allow the pregnant employees to change positions, work less hours or sit in a chair, many find themselves terminated or asked to take a temporary leave of absence that often times becomes permanent. Many are forced to use their Family Medical Leave time before having the baby and must rush back because they’ve run out of time.

Tiffany Beroid’s blood pressure started to rise as her pregnancy advanced. Her doctor gave her a light duty note but Wal-Mart told her they didn’t have light duty work, forcing her to take her pregnancy leave sooner than anticipated. Through social media efforts, pregnant employees of Wal-Mart with problems similar to Beroid’s began networking and an organization called Our Wal-Mart that is a labor union supported group began to advocate on Beroid’s behalf. She was also assisted by a work advocacy group called A Better Balance as well as the National Women’s Law Center.

March 5, 2014 became a day of victory for the thousands of pregnant employees of Wal-Mart when the company issued a new policy that allows its pregnant employees to perform less demanding work if they’re having difficulty fulfilling their duties.

All pregnant women are encouraged to become familiar with The Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978 in order to protect their rights. The policy changes of Wal-Mart are to be commended. Let’s hope other industries will follow suit.

Pregnant Mother Who Drove into the Ocean Will Remain in Hospital

ebony wilkerson

Thank God for common sense. For once, the state of Florida has done something right and kept Ebony Wilkerson, (the 32 year old pregnant mom who drove her kids into the ocean) into a hospital where she rightfully belongs. Wilkerson is 7 months pregnant and certainly doesn’t need to be in a jail where the chances of her having a healthy baby are greatly diminished. Had it not been for good Samaritans who ran into the Atlantic Ocean and rescued Wilkerson, three innocent children and an unborn baby would have met an untimely demise.
What is it about our country that prevents us from recognizing mental illness when it smacks us dead in the face? The fact that Wilkerson was interviewed and released by law enforcement agents three hours before she drove into the ocean is troubling. Mental illness is a public health disease and yet it’s treated as an afterthought in a “too-busy-society” that focuses more on entertainers’ wardrobes and scandals as opposed to its citizens that need immediate attention and intervention.
Pregnancy can bring out the best in women but it can also provoke anxiety, depression, social isolation, rejection, substance abuse and changes in economic status. Pregnant women who have mental illness might be reluctant to take their medications, which only makes their illness worse. Or, they might become victims of domestic violence because of their partners’ lack of desire to have children.
Thank goodness we can learn from our mistakes. Unless law enforcement officers have mental health training, they need to bring patients to an Emergency Department for further evaluation whether they appear to be “normal” or not. Psychiatrists should be alerted before a patient signs out against medical advice (as in the case of Wilkerson) to determine whether the patient needs medication and a possible court ordered stay.
It’s tragic that no one (with the exception of her sister) believed Wilkerson had a mental health problem until she drove her car into the ocean. How many more families will suffer before we finally get it right?

Is Underwater Childbirth Safe? Some Doctors Say No.

Compliments of Health Day News

Compliments of Health Day News

Most women look forward to having a baby but no one wants to feel pain. In recent years, having a baby in a pool of water has become a popular trend because it allegedly reduces the need for pain meds and anesthesia however not so fast, says both obstetricians and pediatricians. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) have issued a formal opinion (Committee Opinion #594 April 2014) that does not support “immersion” (aka underwater) births because of its associated complications while a mother is pushing to deliver her baby. The “pushing” part of childbirth is also known as “second stage labor.”
Why is this important? Because there are presently 143 birthing centers in the U.S. that offer underwater births to pregnant women. In fact, 1% of all births in the United Kingdom are immersion. While some research claims that these births are safe, experts think otherwise and state that the number of women studied was too small to detect rare but potentially harmful outcomes.
While some women may experience a feeling of well being and control, decreased stress and less vaginal tears during an immersion birth, according to the Committee Opinion, there is no scientific evidence that an underwater or immersion birth helps the baby. In fact, there is evidence of increased complications such as
• increased infections to both the mother and newborn, especially after the membranes are ruptured (aka “water broke”)
• difficulty in regulated the newborn’s temperature
• increased risk of the umbilical cord tearing from the placenta
• infant drowning and near drowning
• infant seizures and suffocation
• severe infant breathing problems
Should women give up immersion births completely? Probably not. The experts think that a woman may stay in these tubs during labor but should NOT push or deliver the baby underwater. They also recommend stricter protocols, patient selection and infection control.
If you like what you’ve read, please subscribe to the blog, like me on Facebook, or follow me on Twitter Yourobgyn@twitter.com.

“Help! Our (Pregnant) Mommy is Trying to Kill Us!”

Pregnant mom drives car into the ocean

The three children (ages 3, 9 and 10) and the unborn baby of Ebony Wilkerson are lucky to be alive, despite the fact that she drove her van into the frigid Atlantic Ocean. Two hours prior to this horrific event, the Daytona Police interviewed her, deemed that she was sane and left. The day before, a local hospital kept her overnight for mental health observation for 24 hours and then sent her home. If I were the sister of Ebony Wilkerson, I’d speed-dial liability attorneys and then immediately request Wilkerson’s medical records because obviously someone dropped the proverbial ball.

Wilkerson’s sister knew something wasn’t right because Wilkerson exhibited paranoia and kept discussing Jesus and demons that she felt were controlling her. She had fled South Carolina because she believed that her ex-husband was attempting to kill her. Eerily, Wilkerson is from the same state where Susan Smith drove her children into the ocean 20 years ago and blamed the crime on an unknown man. Unlike Smith, whose children died; Wilkerson and her three children were gratefully rescued by a heroic group of men who selflessly plunged into the water to save them.

Kudos goes to Wilkerson’s sister who had the wisdom to call law enforcement and report her sister’s bizarre behavior and hide her car keys. Unfortunately Wilkerson had another set of keys. What’s troubling about this case is how Wilkerson was able to sign herself out of the hospital and how she fooled the police to thinking that she was sane which meant that didn’t have to “Baker Act” her or commit her to the hospital . I find it hard to believe that Wilkerson could walk out of a hospital after seeing a psychiatrist which leads me to speculate that perhaps the hospital didn’t have a psychiatrist on duty at the time.
Law enforcement officers are not trained mental health specialists. In the future, when they are called for a suspected mental health issue, a better approach might be to take the individual to the hospital, despite the appearance of a person’s “calm demeanor” and let the experts make or rule out the diagnosis of mental illness.

Mental illness is not a joke, America. It claims innocent lives every day.

Please share your thoughts with me on Twitter (Yourobgyn@twitter.com ) or Facebook (www.smartmothersguide@facebook.com ).

Pregnant Moms: Is a 1st Trimester Prenatal Screening Test Right for You?

DNA 2

If you start prenatal care early enough (in the 1st trimester), you will inevitably have to decide on whether you want to be tested for potential genetic problem such as Down syndrome (aka Trisomy 21) or other life-threatening genetic conditions. Terms such as non-invasive prenatal tests (aka NIPS), Integrative Screens and Alpha-Maternal Serum Testing will be hurled at you along with very specific time tables for getting these tests done. Ideally, you should receive extensive counseling so that you may make an informed decision but quite often this is not the case.
Knowing the difference between screening and diagnostic tests is a great way to begin your decision-making process. A screening test identifies potential problems and requires additional testing. A diagnostic test provides a definite answer. Diagnostic tests in the first trimester include chorionic villi sampling (aka CVS) and amniocentesis is usually done in the second trimester. Both of these tests are invasive and carry a small risk for miscarriages. Risk factors such as advanced maternal age (meaning greater than 35) also affect a pregnant woman’s decision because the risk for Down syndrome increases with age. The risk of having any type of genetic disorder is 1 in 190 for women age 35 and 1 in 65 for women age 40.
NIPS have gained in popularity over the past decade because they have a less than 2% false positive rate for detecting Down syndrome by the 10th week of pregnancy but this rate increases slightly for other lethal genetic problems such as trisomy 13 and 18. They work by measuring the amount of fetal DNA found in the mothers’ blood stream. This test does NOT test for open neural tube defects such as Spina Bifida.
The integrative screening test is also done in the first trimester by measuring four pregnancy hormones in the mother’s blood and requires an early ultrasound to measure the baby’s neck (aka “nuchal test”) to rule out Down syndrome and has a false positive rate of approximately 5%. It also requires a second trimester Maternal Serum Alpha Fetal Protein test to rule out open neural tube defects.
The NIPS tests are not cheap, require insurance coverage and costs between $800 to $2700. They also cannot determine future heart problems, whether you’re having twins or other fetal abnormalities. But again, they are the most accurate test regarding screening for Down syndrome.
Questions, comments or suggestions? Please contact me at http://www.smartmothersguide.com, like me at https://www.facebook.com/SmartMothersGuide, or follow me on Twitter Yourobgyn@Twitter.com

Is It Safe to Take Acetaminophen During Pregnancy?

pills

Acetaminophen (the generic brand of Tylenol) is one of the most prescribed drugs for pregnant women around the globe to treat fevers and mild pain. It was thought to be safe but now researchers in Denmark have just disrupted the obstetrical community by suggesting that there is an association between taking acetaminophen during pregnancy and hyperactive children who are diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
This is a profound disappointment to most prenatal care providers whose options are limited in what they can prescribe to pregnant women, especially for a fever. It appears that acetaminophen breaks up hormones and according to the researchers, “abnormal hormonal exposures in pregnancy may influence fetal brain development.”
Although the study reports investigating over 62,000 children, a word of caution must be exercised before making the assumption that acetaminophen is not safe for pregnant women. Remember that in this study:
• There was a stronger association between ADHD and acetaminophen if the mother took it for more than one trimester
• The researchers do not know exactly how many pills the pregnant mothers took
• The risks were greater for pregnant women who took large amounts of acetaminophen throughout their pregnancy
• They do not know if pain is associated with an increased risk of developing ADHD
According to the director of the Maternal-Fetal Medicine program at the Cleveland Clinic, it is important to remember that an association of acetaminophen and ADHD is not the same thing as saying acetaminophen causes ADHD and for that reason, he will continue to provide acetaminophen to his pregnant patients advising them to take it in the manner in which it is prescribed.
The take-home message is that most physicians are not going to change their prescribing patterns based on this study. Please consult with your physician or midwife before taking acetaminophen and only take them as prescribed.
Remember, a healthy pregnancy doesn’t just happen; it takes a smart mother who knows what to do. If you like what you read, please like me on Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/SmartMothersGuide or Twitter, yourobgyn@twitter.com

New Guidelines say Give First-Time Pregnant Women More Time in Labor

Courtesy of Virginiawomen'sbirthcenter.com

Courtesy of Virginiawomen’sbirthcenter.com

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and The Society for Maternal Fetal Medicine (aka high-risk obstetricians) have issued a new recommendation that is a game-changer in the manner that obstetrics is practiced: allow low-risk first-time pregnant moms more time in labor. This is assuming that the fetal tracing is normal and the mother does not have a fever, high blood pressure or a condition that could compromise her life or the life of her unborn baby. This recommendation is based on new evidence that demonstrates contradicts the old school Friedman Curve theory that active labor begins at 4 centimeters. It actually begins at 6 centimeters. This would be especially helpful to first-time teenage moms who might be forced to have future cesarean sections based on hospital rules and physician opinions if their first delivery was a cesarean section. The “once a C-section, always a C-Section” culture hits this particular group the hardest.
According to the new recommendations:
• Women should be allowed to push for at least two hours if they’ve given birth before, three hours if they are first-time mothers, and even longer in certain cases, such as when an epidural is used for pain relief.
• Vaginal delivery is the preferred option whenever possible and doctors should use techniques — forceps, for example — to assist with natural birth.
• Women should be advised to avoid excessive weight gain during pregnancy.
A word of caution should be offered about these recommendations: forceps deliveries are becoming a lost art and can cause more damage than good in the hands of an inexperienced provider and the “avoid excessive weight gain during pregnancy” is easier said than done for most women.
That being said, these new recommendations gives first-time pregnant women the right to step on the proverbial brakes, the next time someone wants to rush their delivery via a C-section.
If you like what you’re reading, please let me know via Twitter (Yourobgyn@Twitter.com) or Facebook (Smartmothersguide@facebook.com)

How to Keep a Short Cervix from Messing Up Your First Pregnancy

Image

It’s your first pregnancy and very exciting. While doing your first ultrasound, the technician frowns as she scans your cervix with a vaginal probe. You ask what’s wrong and she mutters something about the cervix being too short but that your provider will explain more. What’s going on? You could possibly have a short cervix which means you’re at risk for having the baby too soon.

One out of eight babies born in the United States is premature which accounts for over one-half million babies each year. Premature birth is the leading cause of infant death, brain damage, blindness and other complications that costs $26 billion dollars a year in health care.  

Women who have had a previous premature baby are at significant risk for having another one and should be seen immediately by a maternal fetal medicine specialist (a high risk pregnancy specialist).  Does this also apply to women who are pregnant for the first time? The answer is yes. All pregnant women should receive an ultrasound for dating and documenting normal fetal anatomy no later than the middle of the second trimester and if the cervical length is less than 2.5 centimeters, the mother is at risk for a premature birth even if she is not complaining of cramping or bleeding. If the cervix is less than 25 mm or 2.5 cm,

·         A repeat ultrasound should be done ASAP to document the short cervix

·         Vaginal progesterone tablets should be prescribed as soon as possible and before 24 weeks. Why? Because they reduce premature births by 44%

This information is especially important for first-time pregnant women who have no documented history of previous preterm births. Several years ago, first-time pregnant moms with a short cervix were not treated but recent medical studies have proven that these women should be treated. Therefore, a short cervix should not be ignored.

Remember, a healthy pregnancy doesn’t just happen. It takes a smart mother or knows what to do.

Please share this blog with friends, “like” me on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/SmartMothersGuide and follow me on Twitter: yourobgyn@twitter.com

 

 

How can we prevent a Teen Mom from Carrying a Dead Fetus in a Shopping Bag?

Fetus in a shopping bag

Tiona Rodriguez, a 17 year old teen mom was arrested in a New York City Victoria Secrets store on suspicion of shoplifting and accompanied by 17 year-old Francis Estevez, who was also arrested. The security guard looked in the shopping bag and found a foul-smelling dead fetus wrapped in a black plastic bag along with underwear and clothes. Rodriguez informed him that she was 6 months pregnant, had a miscarriage and didn’t know what to do with the baby. She was then taken to Bellevue Hospital, most likely for a psychiatric evaluation. The dead baby was taken to the morgue where it was reported that he weighed 8 ½ pounds and died from suffocation. It is alleged that Rodriguez gave birth at Estevez’s house and from a recent picture on Facebook® where she is wearing camouflage pants and a tee-shirt; it is quite possible that she was concealing the pregnancy. She was allegedly excited about an upcoming interview at a popular restaurant.

There will be those who despise Rodriguez and others who will sympathize with her. Could this tragedy have been prevented? Absolutely and here’s how:

• Rodriguez should have received a long-acting birth control method before leaving the hospital after having her first baby 2 years ago

• All pregnant teens should have at least one home visit during their pregnancy by The Healthy Start Program or the Pregnant Home Visit Program

• Messages about the Safe Haven Infant Protection Law should be plastered in doctors’ offices, prenatal clinics, billboards, text-messages, buses, subways and even on MTV to let families know that they can anonymously leave their baby at a hospital, fire and police departments for three days without getting in trouble

• Adoption IS an option. There are loving parents desperately waiting to adopt newborns and give them a decent home.

A newborn baby took his first breath and then ended up dead in a shopping bag. Who ever thought we’d see this in the 21st century?

Peeping Toms, Breast Pumps and Obamacare

Image

While political extremists continue to have a meltdown and hold our country hostage, there is a recent court decision that illustrates just how far a woman’s rights are protected under the Affordable Care Act, aka “Obamacare.”

On March 23, 2010, breastfeeding mothers were given the privilege of receiving time to express breast milk at work, “other than a bathroom, that is shielded from view and free from intrusion from coworkers and the public.” On October 8, 2013, Kent Gordon, a 45 year-old technologist specialist in Portland, Oregon, received a jail sentence of 10 days for secretly using a surveillance camera in the form of a pen, to video tape a co-worker pumping breast milk behind closed doors in the privacy of her office.

 The co-worker was about to resign from her position to become a stay-at-home mom so Gordon entered her office under the guise of collecting information regarding software licensure. After he left, the co-worker discovered the pen on her desk that was attached to a USB drive and alerted her managers via email. According to an article in the Seattle Times “Gordon went back to the woman’s office that evening but realized the pen was not there. He sent an email to the woman and two other female co-workers whose offices he had entered that day, asking if they had seen his pen in hopes that someone had just picked it up.” The next day, he discovered that the email had been forwarded to his managers. When confronted by his superiors, he resigned from his position but was arrested a few days later.

Gordon alleged that he was trying to his company’s intellectual property by the presiding judge didn’t believe him. In addition to spending 10 days in jail, Gordon must dedicate 160 hours of community service and undergo psychiatric counseling.

In the midst of all of the political hoopla and hysteria, we forget that the name of the health law passed in 2010 included the words “Patient Protection.” A nursing mother has a right to expect that she can pump milk for her baby and not have her privacy invaded by a peeping Tom. Did the court go far enough in Gordon’s sentence to prevent him from future offenses? You tell me.